Why Doesn't Link Speak? - YouTube ~ Live Science: The Most Interesting Articles, Mysteries & Discoveries

Jeanette has asked about the difference between don't and doesn't.These are negative forms of one of the most important verbs in English. My colleague Kory Stamper, an editor of the Learner's Dictionary, responds:. Both don't and doesn't are contractions.Don't is a contraction of do not, while doesn't is a contraction of does not, and they both act as auxiliary verbs.Why Doesn't Warren Buffett Own Any Renewable Energy Stocks? Even with Berkshire Hathaway Energy, the Oracle of Omaha could use some more renewable stocks.If you've searched for an article but still can't watch, check to see if we've reported any service outages. It's pretty rare, but sometimes we have problems connecting to the internet too.With the movement's attention comes a familiar refrain: Why doesn't Black Lives Matter focus on "black-on-black" crime? It's a question asked, in various forms, from Facebook to cableIt doesn't matter how positive you act. This insincerity can make people cautious about you because they're unsure of what's lurking underneath. How to change for the better: Sometimes, anxiety can play a role in how we act around others. If you suffer from low self-esteem, a negative mindset, and unresolved issues and traumas, like I

Why Doesn't Warren Buffett Own Any Renewable Energy Stocks

Why Doesn't Berkshire Hathaway Pay a Dividend? Warren Buffett. Warren Buffett's Bear Market Maneuvers. Portfolio Management. Top 5 Positions in Warren Buffett's Portfolio. Warren Buffett.Why Doesn't God Fix It? is a very professionally written biblical response to the titular question. As someone who often ignores appendices when I read a book, I felt obliged to read Rae's appendices in order to provide an accurate review. I am glad I did, because those appendices were filled with information as valuable as the body of the book.Why Doesn't the U.S. Use the Metric System? Scientific measuring cup or beaker As of today, the only countries that still don't use the metric system are the U.S., Myanmar and Liberia. Because itWealth redistribution is an essential check on capitalism, the market doesn't adjust itself, it needs constant intervention. To say otherwise is just propaganda. Companies need constant welfare from the state or else why do you think they spend so much on spreading their message, buying politicians, etc.

Why Isn't Netflix Working | Netflix Error Codes

Just hours after news broke Monday that Donald Trump called Dr. Anthony Fauci an "idiot" during a call with campaign staff, the president was asked by a reporter why he doesn't just go ahead andThis secret marriage makes Juliet unable to legally marry Paris but at that point, she doesn't want to anyway. Juliet was just shy of 14 at the time of her marriage to Romeo and he was probably around 15. This young age could be part of the reason for their hasty decision. Share Reply. John Adney.When you uncontract doesn't in "Why doesn't it work?" the not moves to "Why does it not work?" This confuses me even more when I use a longer phrase instead of the pronoun it like below: Why doesn't this simple code example work? Why does the word order change when we use a contraction? word-order contractions.Krugman Wonks Out: Why Doesn't Cutting Taxes on the Wealthy Work? April 30, 2021 A banker counts four thousand U.S. dollars at a bank in Westminster, Colorado.The Problem of Evil: Why Doesn't God Stop Tragedy? In a world controlled by an all-powerful God, why does the worst still happen? By Wesley Baines wesley baines

I wouldn't have a good solution for the question "Why does 'Why doesn't it work?' become 'Why does it not work?'" The shift is doubly intriguing if (like me) you don't see a compelling reason (beyond mere convention) why "Why doesn't it work?" couldn't be rendered as "Why does now not it paintings?"

Though any other answerers here imagine the wording "why does not it paintings?" to be ungrammatical, they haven't explained in a lot intensity why they take that view. Indisputably the word sounds awkward—most likely as a result of we are so strongly acclimated to the wording "why does it not work?" as the usual choice to "why doesn't it work?"—but from a purely grammatical standpoint, I've hassle seeing how "why does now not it work?" differs structurally from, say, "why does now not it occur extra ceaselessly?" And if we deem all questions of the form "Why does not…" ungrammatical, how do we distinguish them from questions of the (quite) more effective form "Does not…"? Or are the latter formulations, too, ungrammatical?

Ultimately, it kind of feels to me, concluding that wording of the shape "why does now not" is ungrammatical would logically lead us to condemn a great many sentences that, though old-fashioned sounding, don't appear to wreck any elementary laws of sentence development and able comprehensibility. Let's take a look at some of the many historical instances of this wording.

In the 1600s and 1700s, writers no longer now and again hired interrogative phrases similar to "does not the," "don't the," "isn't the," and "are not the"—as a Google Books search for those phrases makes transparent. From Izak Walton, The Compleat Angler, or the Contemplative Man's Recreation (1653):

Piscator. Now, Sir, has now not my Hostis made haste? And does now not the fish look lovely?

From Richard Baxter, The Saints Everlasting Rest (1654):

Doth now not this Load-stone grasp thy center unto it, and nearly draw it forth of thy brest? Canst thou learn the history of love any longer at once? Doth not thy throbbing heart right here stop to ease it self? And dost thou no longer as Joseph, seek for a spot to weep in? or don't the tears of thy Love bedew those lines?

From Thomas Hobbes, "Problems of Vacuum," in Seven Philosophical Problems, and Two Propositions of Geometry (1662):

If there were empty space in the World, why will have to not there be also some empty area in the Vial earlier than it was once sucked? And then why does now not the water upward thrust to fill that, when a man sucks the Vial he attracts nothing out neither into his Belly nor into his Lungs, nor into his Mouth ; most effective he units the Air inside the glass right into a circular motion, giving it without delay an undertaking to go forth by way of the sucking and an undertaking to go back by means of not receiving it into his mouth.

From John Tillotson, "The Prejudices towards Jesus and his Religion imagine'd," in The Works of the Most Revered Dr. John Tillotson, Late Lord Archbishop of Canterbury (1717):

Whatever commendation may be given to any Art or Science, Men will question the Truth and Reality of it, after they see the biggest a part of those that profess it, not in a position to do any factor answerable to it. The Christian Religion pretends to be an Art of serving God extra decently and devoutly, and of residing better than other Men ; but if or not it's so, why don't the Professors of this very good Religion shew the Force and Virtue of it of their Lives?

From Thomas Rutherford, An Essay on the Nature and Obligations of Virtue (1744):

There is an unfit utility made in giving ache to brutes; why then isn't this a relentless reason in opposition to each motion, which supplies pain to them? why does not it make every such motion irrational and so not worthy for a rational agent? Is it because the use we've of them and the advantages we receive from their ache is a stronger reason why, which intervenes? Then why isn't this reason why from passion, which keeps us clear of any crime in killing or in hurting them, sufficient to make the similar conduct towards our personal species neither irrational nor fallacious?

From Erasmus Darwin & Robert Waring Darwin, Zoonomia; or The Laws of Organic Life, volume 2 (1796):

If the torpor of the uterine veins, which induces the per month classes of the catamenia, be ruled via the build up of terrene gravitation ; that is, via the deficiency of the counter-influence of solar and lunar gravitation ; why does no longer it occur maximum often when the terrene gravitation is the largest, as about six hours after the new moon, and next to that about six hours after the complete moon?

Examples persisted to seem often via the mid-1830s. From R.U. West, "on the Influence of the Nerves," in London Medical and Surgical Journal (March 12, 1832):

And why does no longer it take place under all cases, for bodies all the time develop chilly after dying? Many physiologists contend that the blood in the venæ cavæ is propelled into the right auricle by the atmospheric pressure, because of this of a vacuum formed there via its dilation.

But such expressions appear all at once to have become much less common in the second half of the 19th century, for causes unknown to me.

In a Google Books seek for the word "why does now not the" overlaying the three a long time between 1978 and 2008, most of the matches come from books on economics, philosophy, ethics, and religion, possibly because the diction sounds suitably outdated and sermon-inflected. In any case, instances do still appear. Here are three cases. From Immanuel Wallerstein, "The Rural Economy in Modern World Society" (1975), published in The Capitalist World-Economy (1979):

I might word the highbrow questions of our time—which are the moral questions of our time—as follows: (1) Why is there starvation amidst plenty, and poverty amidst prosperity? (2) Why don't the many who're troubled get up against the few who're privileged, and smite them? You would possibly be aware that I've affected the language of the King James edition of the Bible. I've accomplished this to sign two things. At one stage our problems are biblical ones, this is eternal ones, ones that confront all of human history. But at a 2d level, they tackle a in particular modern shape, of a global whose origins in the sixteenth are heralded precisely through this King James model—a new language for a new era.

From G.L.S. Shackle, Epistemics and Economics (1992)

If the time period cycle is justified, the entirety crucial to the cycle should be present in any 'provide second'. Then the drawback is, why don't these kinds of composing parts unravel themselves at once, why does now not 'the cycle' disappear through a single, complete and rapid adjustment?

From Arthur W. Pink, The Attributes of God (2002):

And what of apostate Christendom, where every conceivable form of sin is now tolerated and practiced under cover of the holy identify of Christ? Why does not the righteous wrath of Heaven make an end of such abominations? Only one answer is imaginable: because God bears with "much longsuffering the vessels of wrath suited to destruction."

A Google Books search even reveals three circumstances of the phrase "why does no longer it paintings" in fresh publications. From Consumer Energy Price Increases: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on the Consumer of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation (August 7, 1990):

Senator LIEBERMAN. If all this is true, then why does not it work in reverse? In different words, if the build up in the international value, because of expectancies, because you are, planning to buy the coming provide of crude oil bids up the worth? Why does now not it work the other way when the global value drops, why does no longer the value pass down?

From Ronald Finklestein, Celebrating Success! The Power of Attitude! (2003):

You give your self permission to just accept and express this excellent. Thank you spirit and so it's! So why does not it paintings all the time? Let me percentage with you some issues that can conflict with you attaining you life's dream.

And from Nubar Sarafyan, The Action Principle and Evolution (2009):

But if this is true, then how can one explain the lifestyles the massive gravity inside of the barred galaxies and black holes, where matter reasonable density, clearly, is way less. Besides, if the gravity is the best situation of life, then why does now not it paintings in the limits of galaxy nucleus, by which the energy massive transmission processes completely happen.

These examples refute the perception that no one makes use of the wording "why does now not"—even in the case of the awkward and decidedly unidiomatic "why does not it paintings." Nor is it obtrusive to me that the development is illogical or fatally incoherent. It sounds slightly bizarre, for sure, and it's moderately rare (which is most likely why it sounds ordinary), but—if I might channel the voice of Senator Lieberman for a second—why must not we view it as grammatically applicable?